BACKROUND AND SIGNIFICANCE
This is a pilot study designed to help in the development of a large-scale research project on the future of work in the hospitality industry. The hospitality industry has experienced a wave of restructuring, consolidation, and new practices to cut costs including lean staffing and greater performance demands on the workforce. The study will explore the impact of these and related changes on the health and quality of life the largest occupational group within the hospitality industry, room cleaners. Jobs in housekeeping (and food and beverage) operations of the hospitality industry represent the future of work in this growing service sector with jobs characterized by increasing repetitive physical workloads, low income, low skill utilization, low job control, and virtually no prospects for training and career advancement. There is compelling evidence that this kind of low-income jobs result in a disproportionate high burden of illness, injury, and disability. Unlike other services, businesses in the hospitality industry, cannot be moved across the borders but will remain a fast growing sector in industrialized countries, creating increasing societal costs including disproportionate workers’ compensation and health care utilization costs. Working conditions in the hospitality industry are representative for a growing number of workers of color, working women, and former welfare recipients. The hospitality industry has become a major target for welfare-to-work and job training programs in cities throughout the country. An aging workforce is faced with increasing job demands in a competitive industry constantly upgrading services. Few studies have been done on this growing workforce and little is known about their specific working conditions and health risks and how they could be addressed.
This study will take a broad view at physical and psychosocial job factors, health, including general self-rated health, musculoskeletal disorders, work-related injury, and health-related quality of life. Further, this study will investigate which innovative organizational strategies can help to reduce the burden of illness and disability in the service sector by comparing hotels in different market segments, different degrees of unionization, and hotels with innovative joint labor management health and safety programs, negotiated child care/elder care benefits, and a multi-employer worker training project.
The Ambassador/Friends of the Muni Program is up and runnin. The overall pupose of the program is to improve service, to improve working conditions, and to improve relationships between operators and their riders.
The program was established in the 1996 Memorandum of Understanding, articles 5 and 6. The MOU sets up the “Muni Improvement Fund (MIF)” as the governing body for the Ambassador/Friends of Muni program. The MIF trustees are the same as for the TWU-Muni Trust Fund.
The Ambassador Program is a pilot. We are going to focus on twelve lines. Once we succeed on those lines we’ll move the program through the system, so that every single line will become an Ambassador line.
Here’s the heart of the program.
The program has already begun on the 22-Filmore. All of us working together identified problem areas such as scheduling, passenger load, safety, and stress. In order to address these problems, and to create a better working environment, we agreed to put three more buses on the 22 line. We have taken other steps to improve services on the line, and by all account operators are pleased. The next step is to meet late this month with 22-Filmore line operators and others to discuss training needs and ideas.
The program has hired a coordinator, Danny Beagle, who is meeting with operators, union leaders and Muni staff in order to put together all of the elements of the program.
Contact: Professor Michael Marmot
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health
University College London
1-19 Torrington Place
London WC1E 6BT
Tel: 44 171 391 1717
Fax: 44 171 813 0280
The Whitehall study examined mortality rates over 10 years among male British Civil Servants aged 20-64. The study was an attempt to avoid some of the problems created by the use of general social class groupings, e.g., the heterogeneity of occupations within a single class leaves room for differing interpretations. The Whitehall study concentrates on one “industry” in which there is little heterogeneity within occupational grades and clear social divisions between grades (Marmot, Kogevinas and Elston, 1987).
An inverse association between grade (level) of employment and mortality from CHD and a range of other causes was observed (78). Men in the lowest grade (others = messengers, doorkeepers, etc.) had a three-fold higher mortality rate than men in the highest grade (administrators) (Marmot, Shipley and Rose, 1984).
Grade is also associated with other specific causes of death, whether or not the causes were related to smoking (Marmot, Kogevinas and Elston, 1987). While low status was associated with obesity, smoking, less leisure time physical activity, more baseline illness, higher blood pressure, and shorter height (78), controlling for all of these risk factors accounted for no more than 40% of the grade difference in CHD mortality (Marmot, Shipley and Rose, 1984; Marmot, Kogevinas and Elston, 1987). After controlling for standard risk factors, the lowest grade still had a relative risk of 2.1 for CHD mortality compared to the highest grade (Marmot, 1994).
One possible explanation of the remaining grade differences in CHD mortality is grade differences in job control and job support (Marmot, Kogevinas and Elston, 1987). In addition, blood pressure at work was associated with “job stress”, including “lack of skill utilization”, “tension”, and “lack of clarity” in tasks. The rise in blood pressure from the lowest to the highest job stress score was much larger among low grade men than among upper grade men. Blood pressure at home, on the other hand, was not related to job stress level (78).
Thus, a second longitudinal study of British Civil Servants (Whitehall II) was initiated to investigate occupational and other social influences on health and disease (Marmot, 1994). The final sample was 6900 men and 3414 women aged 35-55 in the London offices of 20 civil service departments (Marmot et al., 1991). Employment grade was strongly associated with work control and varied work (measures of decision latitude) as well as fast pace (a measure of job demands) (Marmot et al., 1991; Marmot, 1994). Lack of control on the job is related to long spells of absence (> 6 days) (Marmot, 1994).
In addition, there was no decrease in the difference in prevalence of ischemia depending upon employment category over the 20 years separating Whitehall I and Whitehall II (Marmot et al., 1991). Plasma cholesterol concentrations did not differ by job category, and the small inverse association between job status and blood pressure in men was reduced from that seen in the Whitehall I study. There was a significant inverse relation between BMI and job status, but, especially in men, the differences were small. The risk factor that differed most between employment categories was smoking. Moderate or vigorous exercise was less common among subjects in lower status jobs (Marmot et al., 1991).
Risk indicators for myocardial infarction and psycho-social working conditions. Peter Westerholm , Lars Alfredson, Evy Fellenius, Monica Soderholm, Tores Theorell, Ulf de Faire, et al.
This project aims at examining the association between workplace conditions – primarily psychological factors and social conditions – and risk indicators for cardiac infarction, i.e. biochemical variables (blood lipids, fibrinogen etc.) and increased blood pressure (Acronym: WOLF: Work, lipids, fibrinogen). One of the aims of the study is also to examine whether already known risk factors for cardiac infarction such as smoking, food habits, physical exercise etc. have any impact which can be modified by the psychological and social workplace factors. The study is carried out with self administered questionnaires and measurement of blood pressure and analyses of biochemical variables. The target population: 6000 employees in ages 30 to 60 recruited from the Stockholm labour market. The project is carried out in collaboration between the National Institute for Working Life, the Karolinska Institute (Institute of Environmental Medicine), Institute of Psychosocial Factors and Health, Department of Social Medicine Kronan, Sundbyberg and the Medical and Occupational Health Departments of Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm. The field organisation of the project consists of more than 20 occupational health service units.
Financial support: Swedish Council for Work Life Research.
Thanks to Yrkesmedicin for this information:
Department of Occupational Health, Karolinska Hospital
SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
phone +46 8 517 730 56
Job strain and major risk factors for coronary heart disease. Baseline results from the WOLF study. Lars Alfredson, Niklas Hammar, Ulf de Faire, Johan Hallqvist, Tores Theorell, Peter Westerholm
In this study we analyzed the relationship of job strain (high pshychological job demands and low decision latitude) to hypertension, serum lipids and plasma figrinogen. The study population consisted of employed persons 15-64 years of age in Stockholm, Sweden, and the data collection was carried out during 1992-1995. A total of 5696 subjects participated in a medical examinatrion and completed a questionnaire (76% of all invited). No strong associations were seen between job strain and hypertension or plasma fibrinogen, but men reporting high psychological demands had higher fibrinogen levels than other men. Somilar tendencies were seen in women. Men reporting job strain also had more often an adverse LDL/HDL balance than other men, and this association was considerably stronger in subjects aged 15-44 than in older subjects. Our results do not support the hypothesis that low job strain has an adverse impact on hypertension, serum total cholesterol and plasma fibrinogen levels. However, an atherogenic cholesterol profile with low HDL levels and high LDL/HDL ratios for subjects reporting job strain was suggestede, in particular among men.
SHEEP is a major epidemiological study on cardiovascular disease and it’s biomedical risk factors. It is a case-referent study of the first myocardial infarction in men and women (1500 men and 700 women in the ages 45-70) and the same number of referents. It has been established, along with WOLF (WOrk, Lipids and Fibrinogen) as a collaborative effort with several various occupational health care teams, and regional research departments and institutes, hospital departments of medicine. Both projects are part of an EU collaboration including Tores Theorell, Michael Marmot, Johannes Siegrist, and others.
Anders Ahlbom, Johan Hallqvist, Christina Reuterwall, Ulf de Faire, Finn Diderichsen, Christer Hogstedt, Tores Theorell, Lars Alfredson, Per Gustavsson, Nils Plato, Eva Vingard, Piroska Ostlin et al.
The incidence of myocardial infarction (MI) has been shown to vary across different occupational, social, and ethnical groups, between geographic regions, and over time; those variations, however, can only partly be explained by between-group differences in the risk factors hypertension, hyperlipidimi, and smoking. A large number of other risk factors – some of them work related – have also been suggested. The present case-referent study will test several hypotheses concerning risk factors for MI, such as occupational exposure to chemical and/or psychosocial factors, social and environmental factors, dietary and smoking habits, and biological/medical factors. Special attention is paid to potential interaction between the various factors. The study will compromise approximately 2100 cases (1400 men and 700 women) of acute MI (first episode) in the Stockholm county area and the referents are chosen from the general population. Exposure information is collected through questionnaires and biomedical examination.
Several research and clinical units are cooperating in the project – Institute of Environmental Medicine and Department of Social Medicine at Karolinska Institute, the National Institute for Working Life and the National Institute of Psychosocial Factors and Health, Stockholm County units of Environmental Health, Social Medicine, and Occupational Health, Karolinska Hospital and the Departments of Medicine at each of the ten emergency hospitals in the Stockholm County area. Exposure information was collected 1992-1994 and the first results will be reported in 1996.
Financial support by Stockholm County Council, The Social Research Council, and The Medical Research Council.
Thanks to Yrkesmedicin for this information:
Department of Occupational Health, Karolinska Hospital
SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
phone +46 8 517 730 56
In earlier studies the French population has shown a lower incidence of cardiac infarction as compared to the Swedish population.
As a result of the collaboration between Renault and Volvo, scientific research concerning cardiac risk factors has been conducted, especially as related to work situations (with preventive health care as the final objective).
In 1993 1000 men 45-50 years of age (in both companies) were divided by professional level into 4 blue collar and 4 white collar categories, and evaluated by a questionnaire and laboratory studies.
During 1996/1997 an in depth hospital study of 90 high risk and 90 low risk individuals from each country will be performed, involving new ultrasonographic methods and special laboratory tests such as insulin, as well as frozen sera for possible future use.
In 1998 all 2000 individuals will be followed up with health examinations; this procedure is planned to be redone after a period of 10 years.
No large differences have been shown between the two countries with respect to relevance of traditional risk factors (the traditional risk factors also include the Framhingham Risk Index).
The psychosocial questions are currently under analysis. Thus far we have seen that mean Type A-score (Bortner-scale) is higher among French employees and increases with higher worker categories in both countries. There does not seem to be big differences between the white-collar categories in the two countries. Analyses concerning Karasek scores in relation to traditional cardiac risk factors is presently being done with the help of Professor Kristina Orth-Gomer.
We are currently analysing the impact of life events where we will study separate, specific, work related life events.
In addition, analysis is ongoing concerning alcohol consumption, as well as concerning a broad dietary questionnaire involving the hogh and low risk groups mentioned above.
As the project has numerous dimensions, and many analyses are ongoing, we are currently (January 1997) not ready to give any definite conclusions. Several of our sub-studies have been submitted for publication, and are expected to be published soon.
The odds of those in High Strain Jobs having had a Myocardial Infarction were: HES: 2.48 (p=.012) and HANES: 3.28 (p=.001)
times that of those Not in High Strain Jobs, controlling for age AJPH, 1988
The Health Examination Survey (HES) 1960-62 is based on an examination of a representative sample of 6,672 persons drawn from the civilian non-institutionalized population of the United States, ages 18 to 79. The detailed component of the Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (HANES), conducted between 1971 and 1975, is similar to the HES in that it is also representative of non institutionalized persons in the United States (6,913 subjects ages 25-74 were examined). Sample weights derived for these surveys are used as appropriate. Both the HES and HANES involve clinical examinations and follow very similar data collection procedures. Our analyses are restricted to males who report current occupation (approximately 17 per cent of the males in each sample are missing occupation data) which results in final sample sizes of 2,409 (2,088 Whites) in the HES, and 2,424 (2,136 Whites) in the HANES.
In the HES data, the presence of myocardial infarction was judged by a clinical panel of four doctors. Myocardial infarctions were classified as definite (93 per cent) or suspect (7 per cent) based on a review of the 12-lead electrocardiograms (EKG), chest X-rays, medical history, and blood chemistry during analyses. The presently available HANES data on coronary heart disease (CHD) are based on the diagnosis made by the field examining physicians after reviewing the medical history, the detailed cardiovascular questionnaire, and the complete physical examination. (Chest X-ray and EKG tracings may or may not have been available. An improved classification based on expert EKG evaluation is still in process.) These criteria have probably led to an underestimation of overall myocardial infarction on the HANES. Experience with examining physicians’ initial diagnosis compared to final diagnosis with the HES shows relatively few false positive CHD cases but a larger number of false negatives. To reduce the unreliability due to misclassification when angina is included, we decided to focus on that subset of CHD which is most reliably assessed, myocardial infarctions (ICD codes, 410-414). The number of cases in the HES is 39 (33 Whites) and 30 in the HANES (28 Whites).
Aim of the study: This prospective study is designed to assess, in France, the prevalence of hypertension, the one-year incidence of hypertension (unknown today) and the relationship between incidence of hypertension and environmental, occupational and social factors.
Subjects and Methods: Every worker in France, whatever his/her occupation, is affiliated with an occupational medical center and has a systematic clinical check-up every year. In order to ensure a good representation of our sample, we therefore selected from a list of occupational physicians a sample of 50 physicians according to their age and to the typology and location in France, of their occupational center. Each physician then selected randomly 800 workers among his/her assigned population. During the usual systematic annual visit, blood pressure was recorded with a validated semi-automatic device (Omron® > 705 CP) at the 5th, 6th and 7th of rest in the sitting position. When the average of these 3 measurements was 140 / 90 mmHg, a second visit was scheduled one month later for a repeat BP measurement under the same conditions. At each visit, a specifically designed questionnaire was used to record height, body weight, drug treatment, socio-economic status, the level of cardiovascular risks factors as reported by the patient, and an estimation of his/her medical drug consumption over the last year. We anticipated a representative sample of 30,000 French workers. During the second year of the study, a case-control study will be conducted among the cohort of newly identified hypertensive patients and an appropriate cohort of control subjects to assess relationship between psychosocial and occupational factors (Karasek questionnaire) and blood pressure modifications
Results : The study started on January 1st, 1997. On September 1st, 20188 subjects (mean age 38.9 ± 9.4 years, proportion of males 56.9%) have been enrolled.. Among the untreated patients, 10% had at the first visit, a mean BP ³ 140 / 90 mmHg, and 90% of them could be seen at the one-month visit.
Conclusion: The inclusion rate is respected in this study and the prevalence data will be available for the ISH meeting.
The Cornell University cohort study of ‘job strain’ and ambulatory blood pressure, begun in 1985, has enrolled 372 initially healthy full-time employees from a wide variety of job titles, aged 30-60, most with at least 3 years tenure with their employer. Of the 372 participants, 80 (22%) are women, and 95 (25%) are members of minority racial/ethnic groups, including 67 Black, 21 Hispanic and 4 Asian participants. An additional 100 participants, nurses and nurses aides from a new worksite (almost all are female and 50% members of minority groups), are being recruited in 1995 and their evaluation will be completed by 11/1/95. Every three years, participants wear an ambulatory (portable) blood pressure monitor for 24 hours on a work day. Subjects also receive medical tests and complete a questionnaire. Every 15 minutes during waking hours (and during hourly sleep) the monitor inflates and records blood pressure. During waking hours, the subject is asked to remain as motionless as possible and then to record his/her activity, location, position, and mood in a diary. The diary information (i.e., whether the subjects reported being at work, home or sleep) has been used to calculate average AmBPs for each location category.
The Cornell study was one of the first work stress studies to use an ambulatory blood pressure monitor. The monitor provides a more reliable measure of blood pressure, since there is no “observer bias” and the number of readings is increased. It also has a more valid (accurate) measure of average blood pressure than causal blood pressure measurements, since blood pressure is measured during a person’s normal daily activities. Studies using an ambulatory monitor, including the Cornell study, have generally found positive associations between ‘job strain’ and blood pressure.